Keywords
ius in bello
Soleimani
Targeted killing
How to Cite
Abstract
This study analyses the lawfulness of the targeted killing of General Qasem Soleimani in Iraq by a U.S. armed drone on January 2, 2020. As the United States of America provided different justifications for the strike against Soleimani, this article assesses the lawfulness of unmanned aerial vehicles and the legal justifications for the killing under ius in bello and ius ad bellum: the existence of an ongoing international armed conflict between the United States and Iran that would make Soleimani a legitimate military target; the possible consent of the territorial State to the military action, and the lawfulness of the invocation of the exercise of self-defense by the United States against Iran due to previous armed incidents. This case highlights the challenges in justifying targeted killings under International Law as their extrajudicial nature raises concerns about their legitimacy under International Humanitarian Law and the right of self-defense is of no use when a State fails to demonstrate the existence of an ongoing armed attack or its imminence.
References
Akerson, David (2013). “The illegality of offensive lethal autonomy”. In Saxon, Dan (Ed.): International Humanitarian Law and the changing technology of war (65-98). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Alston (2010). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Philip Alston. Addendum. Study on targeted killings, A/HRC/14/24/Add.6, 28 May 2010.
Asaro, Peter (2012). “On banning autonomous weapons systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making”. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 687-709. DOI:10.1017/S181638311200768.
Bellier, Stéphanie (2006). “Unilateral and Multilateral Preventive Self-Defense”. Maine Law Review, 58(2), 507-542.
Binkay, Ahmet Berk (2020). “Causes and effects of the assassination of Qasem Soleimani: A political perspective”. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 1, 159-166. DOI: 10.12775/CJPS.2020.009.
Callamard, Agnés (2020). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Annex, A/HRC/44/38, 29 June 2020.
Fornari, Mateo (2020). “Algunas cuestiones planteadas por el asesinato selectivo del general Soleimani”. Agenda Internacional, 38, 29-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.202001.002.
Frisch, Hillel, et al. (2020). The Soleimani killing: An initial assessment. Mideast Security and Policy Studies nº 168, The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies.
Guedes de Oliveira, Marcos Aurélio and Santos da Cruz, Vinicius Cezar (2024). “Framing targeted killings in newspapers: The cases of Osama Bin Laden and Qassem Soleimani”, Norteamérica. Revista Académica del CISAN-UNAM, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2024.1.635
Haque, Adil Ahmad (2020). “U.S. Legal defense of the Soleimani strike at the United Nations: A critical assessment”, Just Security, 10 January, 2020, available at https://www.justsecurity.org/68008/u-s-legal-defense-of-the-soleimani-strike-at-the-united-nations-a-critical-assessment/ [accessed: 22 March 2025].
Heyns (2013). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns, A/HRC/23/47, 9 April 2013.
Hodges Scott A. (2020). The killing of Qasem Soleimani. Assassination or lawful military strike?, The Reporter, 20 October 2020, available at https://www.jagreporter.af.mil/Post/Article-View-Post/Article/2539536/the-killing-of-qassem-soleimani/ [accessed: 22 March 2025].
I.C.J. (1986). Military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 14.
I.C.J. (2003). Oil platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2003, p. 161.
I.C.R.C. (1987). Article 36 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977, Commentary of 1987, available at https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-36/commentary/1987?activeTab= [accessed: 22 March 2025].
I.C.R.C. (2025). Rule 65. Perfidy. Available at https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule65#Fn_56A2126F_00001 [accessed: 22 March 2025].
I.C.R.C. (2025b). Fundamentals of International Humanitarian Law, available at https://casebook.icrc.org/law/fundamentals-ihl#b_iii_1_A [accessed: 22 March 2025].
I.C.T.Y. (1995). The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic. Decision on the defense motion for interlocutory appeal on jurisdiction, 2 October 1995.
Iran (2020). Letter dated 3 January 2020 from the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, S/2020/13.
Iran (2020b). Letter dated 7 January 2020 from the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, S/2020/16.
Iran (2020c). Letter dated 8 January 2020 from the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, S/2020/19.
Iraq (2014). Letter dated 25 June 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Iraq to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, Doc. S/2014/440, 25 June 2014.
Iraq (2014b). Letter dated 20 September 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Iraq to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council, Doc. S/2014/691, 22 September 2014.
Iraq (2020). Identical letters dated 6 January 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Iraq to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, S/2020/15, 6 January 2020.
Iraq (2020b). Identical letters dated 9 January 2020 from the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Iraq to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, S/2020/26.
Jackson, Stephen (2022). “An imperfect war: The legality of the Soleimani strike and why the Biden administration should adopt its precedent for future operations in Iraq and Afghanistan”, Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 11(1), 34-107.
Kelemen, Bence Kis and Kiss, Matyas (2022). “The targeted killing of Qasem Soleimani: A case study through the lens of jus ad bellum”, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 63(3), 177-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00405.
Klamberg, Mark (2014). “International Law in the age of asymmetrical warfare, virtual cockpits and autonomous robots”. In Klamberg, Mark, et al.: International Law and changing perceptions of security (152-170). Brill.
Kleczkowska, Agata (2023). “Autonomous weapons and the right of self-defense”. Israel Law Review, 56, 24-40.
Kondoch, Boris (2020). “The killing of General Qassem Soleimani: Legal and Policy Issues”. Journal of East Asia & International Law, 13(2), 419-434. DOI:10.14330/jeail.2020.13.2.09.
Molloy, Taran (2021). “Qasem Soleimani, targeted killing of state actors, and Executive Order 12,333”. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 52(1), 163-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v52i1.6849.
O’Connell, Mary Ellen (2015). “Game of drones”. American Journal of International Law, 109(4), 889-900.
O’Connell, Mary Ellen (2012). “Seductive drones: Learning from a decade of lethal operations”. Journal of Law, Information & Science, 21(2), 116-139.
O’Connell, Mary Ellen (2020). “The killing of Soleimani and International Law”. EJIL: Talk!, 6 January 2020, available at https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-killing-of-soleimani-and-international-law/ [accessed: 22 March 2025].
O’Connell, Mary Ellen (2023). “Banning autonomous weapons: A legal and ethical mandate”. Ethics and International Affairs, 37(3), 287-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000357.
Security Council (2003). S/RES/1483, 22 May 2003.
U.S.-Iraq (2008). Strategic Framework Agreement for a Relationship of Friendship and Cooperation between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq, available at https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/122076.pdf [accessed: 22 March 2025].
United States (2020). Statement by the Department of Defense, 2 January 2020, available at https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/release/article/2049534/statement-by-the-department-of-defense/, and Memorandum for John A. Eisenberg, Legal Advisor to the National Security Council, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, 10 March 2020, available at https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-04/2020-03-10_soleimani_airstrike_redacted_2021.pdf [accessed: 22 March 2025].
United States (2020b). Remarks by President Trump on the killing of Qasem Soleimani, 3 January 2020, available at https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-killing-qasem-soleimani/
United States (2020c). Letter dated 8 January 2020 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council, S/2020/20.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Behavior & Law Journal