Firma auténtica y firma autofalsificada: diferencias y coincidencias en el comportamiento escrito
PDF (Español (España))

How to Cite

Gomez Sanchez, E., López Pérez, R., & Perinat, L. (2015). Firma auténtica y firma autofalsificada: diferencias y coincidencias en el comportamiento escrito. Behavior & Law Journal, 1(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.47442/blj.v1.i1.17

Abstract

In recent years, the Courts, are increase their requests of forensic handwriting analysis which aims to analyze a possible auto-simulated signatures. However, research has focused mainly on the study of handwrite simulation in situations where a person intends to simulate the handwriting of another person. In this research, we study the auto-simulation of handwrite with the intention of avoiding a future legal commitment. The sample consisted of 121 individuals who perform their own signature and an auto-simulated signature. The variables of pressure, speed, legibility, and traits are analyzed. The existence of significant differences in pressure, speed and type gestures is found, being the auto-simulated signature less pressed and less rapid than the true signature and existing higher probability of occurrence of traits in the authentic one.

https://doi.org/10.47442/blj.v1.i1.17
PDF (Español (España))

References

Anónimo. (1847). Fuero viejo de castilla. Madrid: Lima.

Antón, Francisco, & Luis, Juan Vicente. (2012). Policía científica Vol.II. Valencia: Tirant lo blanch.

Bardy, Gustav. (1936). Faux et fraudes littéraires dans l'antiquité chrétienne.

Blandon-Gitlin, Iris. ( 2011). Improving lie detection by increasing cognitive load: The effect of repeated questioning and individual differences. Paper presented at the 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Hyatt Regency Miami, Miami, FL.

Cicerón, M.T., de Oviedo y Portal, R., & Baylo, A. (1792). Cartas de Cicerón: En la Imprenta de D. Benito Cano, se hallará en la librería de Don Antonio Baylo.

Couture, Eduardo J. (1976). Vocabulario jurídico. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Depalma.

García, J., & Fidalgo, R. (2003). Diferencias en la conciencia de los procesos psicológicos de la escritura mecánicos frente a sustantivos y otros. Psicothema, 15(1), 41-48.

Gayet, Jean. (1962). Manual de la policía científica. Barcelona: Zeus.

Guiral, Maggie. (1927). La valeur de la preuve dans l'expertise d'écritures. Lyon.

Lara, F. (Ed.). (1982). Código de Hammurabi. Madrid: Editora Nacional.

Latierro, F.V., & Moreno, O.P.V. (1966). Grafocrítica: Tecnos.

Lengua, La Real Academia Española de la (Producer). (2014). Real academia espalola. Retrieved from http://www.rae.es/

Locard, E. (2010). Manual de técnica policíaca: Editorial Maxtor Librería.

Luria, Gil, & Rosenblum, Sara. (2010). Comparing the handwriting behaviours of true and false writing with computerized handwriting measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1115-1128. doi: 10.1002/acp.1621

Martín Ramos, Rafael. (2010). Documentoscopia método para el peritaje científico de documentos. Madrid: La Ley.

Pellat, Solange. (1927). Les lois de l'ecriture. París: Vuibert.

Ras, Matilde. (1942). Grafología. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.

Robles Llorente, Miguel Ángel, & Vega Ramos, Antonio. (2009). Grafoscopia y pericia caligráfica forense. Barcelona: Bosch.

Vega, Antonio, & Robles, Miguel Ángel. (2000). Grafoscopia. Identificación de escritura y firmas. Barcelona: Cedecs.

Viñals, Francisco, & Puente, Mª Luz. (2006a). Diccionario jurídico-pericial del documento escrito. Barcelona: Herder.

Viñals, Francisco, & Puente, Mª Luz. (2006b). Pericia caligráfica judicial. Barcelona: Herder.

Vrij, Aldert. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit : pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester ; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Vrij, Aldert, Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), 253-265. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y

Walczyk, Jeffrey, Igou, Frank D., Dixon, Lexie P., & Tcholakian, Talar. (2013). Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00014

Walczyk, Jeffrey, Roper, Karen, Seemann, Eric, & Humphrey, Angela. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(7), 755-774. doi: 10.1002/acp.914

Walczyk, Jeffrey, Schwartz, Jonathan P., Clifton, Rayna, Adams, Barett, Wei, M. I. N., & Zha, Peijia. (2005). Lying person-to-person about life events: a cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 141-170. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00484.x

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.