How to Cite
Abstract
El interrogatorio y la entrevista policial son unos de los elementos más importantes en la investigación criminal. Uno de sus principales objetivos es obtener información veraz tanto de sospechosos como de testigos que sirva para esclarecer el delito investigado. Para conseguir ese objetivo, diversas técnicas de persuasión son utilizadas en función del tipo de interrogatorio que se aplique. En esta revisión teórica se ha adoptado un proceso de revisión sistemática mediante el cual recopilaremos y analizaremos estudios procedentes de dos bases de datos diferentes, planteando los factores que influyen en el proceso de interrogatorio y relacionándolos con las técnicas de persuasión identificadas en estos y sus potenciales riesgos.References
Alison, L., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., Waring, S., & Christiansen, P. (2014). Whatever you say, say nothing: Individual differences in counter interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of right wing, AQ inspired and paramilitary terrorists. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 170–175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.031
Baxter, J. S., Boon, J. C. W., & Marley, C. (2006). Interrogative pressure and responses to minimally leading questions. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 87–98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.017
Beauregard, E., Deslauriers-Varin, N., & St-Yves, M. (2010). Interactions between factors related to the decision of sex offenders to confess during police interrogation: a classification-tree approach. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(3), 343–367. Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. http://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210370707
Chew, P. G. L. (1995). Aikido politics in interview interaction. Linguistics and Education, 7(3), 201–220. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(95)90023-3
Choe, D. H. (2013). The prosecutor’s interview with suspects in South Korea. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(4), 322–342. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.07.007
Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence. The psychology os persuasion. New York.
Davison, S. E., & Gossop, M. (1999). The Management of Opiate Addicts in Police Custody. Medicine, Science and the Law , 39(2), 153–160. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1177/002580249903900210
Diccionario de la lengua española (RAE). (2016). Retrieved from http://dle.rae.es/?id=SkN2E1W
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (2010). The Cognitive Interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting Therapeutic Jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5), 321–328. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004
Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the Cognitive Interview: enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 722–727. Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.
Forrest, K. D., Wadkins, T. A., & Larson, B. A. (2006). Suspect personality, police interrogations, and false confessions: Maybe it is not just the situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(3), 621–628. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.002
Gaines, P. (2011). The Multifunctionality of Discourse Operator Okay: Evidence from a police interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3291–3315. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.005
Gall, J. A. M., & Freckelton, I. (1999). Fitness for interview: current trends, views and an approach to the assessment procedure. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 6(4), 213–223. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1353-1131(99)90000-7
González, J. L. (2009). La entrevista policial: aspectos generales. In Manual de Investigación Policial, módulo 6: Técnicas indagatorias (pp. 569–580). (Gobierno de Canarias): Thomson Reuters.
Gudjonsson, G. (2016). Memory distrust syndrome, confabulation and false confession. Cortex. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.013
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). Psychology brings justice: the science of forensic psychology. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health : CBMH, 13(3), 159–167. Journal Article.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2006). Sex offenders and confessions: How to overcome their resistance during questioning. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13(4), 203–207. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.02.003
Gudjonsson, G. H., & Petursson, H. (1991). Custodial interrogation: Why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude and personality? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 295–306. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90116-S
Gudjonsson, G. H., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (1999). The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R) factor structure and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(5), 953–968. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00278-5
Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2006). Custodial interrogation, false confession and individual differences: A national study among Icelandic youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 49–59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.012
Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Sigfusdottir, I. D., & Asgeirsdottir, B. B. (2008). False confessions and individual differences: The importance of victimization among youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 801–805. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.010
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30(5), 603–619. Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9053-9
Heydon, G. (2011). Silence: Civil right or social privilege? A discourse analytic response to a legal problem. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(9), 2308–2316. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.003
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckey, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrrogation and confesions (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: looking ahead. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 49–52. Journal Article. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9217-5
Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest : A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 5(2), 33–67. Journal Article. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the Power of Confession Evidence: An Experimental Test of the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 469–484. article. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490
Launay, C., & Py, J. (2015). Methods and aims of investigative interviewing of adult witnesses: An analysis of professional practices. Pratiques Psychologiques, 21(1), 55–70. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2014.11.001
Le Bihan, P., & Bénézech, M. (2013). Psychologie des faux aveux : données classiques et contemporaines. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 171(7), 468–475. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2013.05.009
Leo, R. A., & Liu, B. (2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 381–399. Journal Article. http://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872
Madon, S., Guyll, M., Scherr, K. C., Greathouse, S., & Wells, G. L. (2012). Temporal discounting: The differential effect of proximal and distal consequences on confession decisions. Law and Human Behavior. JOUR PMID - 22471381, Madon, Stephanie: Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, W112 Lagomarcino Hall, Ames, IA, US, 50011, madon@iastate.edu: Educational Publishing Foundation. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0093962
Mason, M. (2016). The “preparatory” and “argumentation” stages of police interrogation: A linguistic analysis of a criminal investigation. Language & Communication, 48, 79–87. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.03.001
McMurtrie, H., Baxter, J. S., Obonsawin, M. C., & Hunter, S. C. (2012). Consistent witness responses: The effects of age and negative feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 958–962. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.008
Nakane, I. (2011). The role of silence in interpreted police interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(9), 2317–2330. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.013
Newcombe, P. A., & Bransgrove, J. (2007). Perceptions of witness credibility: Variations across age. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–331. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.04.003
Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). (1984).
PubMed. (2016). Retrieved from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed
Rix, K. J. . (1998). Silence in interview: psychiatry and the Argent conditions. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine (Vol. 5). http://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-1131(98)90135-3
Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481–486. Journal Article. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x
Science Direct. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.americalatina.elsevier.com/corporate/es/science_direct.php
Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1994). Alcohol and drug intoxication during police interrogation and the reasons why suspects confess to the police. Addiction, 89(8), 985–997. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03358.x
Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). The psychological characteristics of “false confessors”. A study among icelandic prison inmates and juvenile offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(3), 321–329. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00184-0
Tata, P. R., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1990). The effects of mood and verbal feedback on interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(10), 1079–1085. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90136-F
Vernham, Z., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Hillman, J. (2014). Collective interviewing: A transactive memory approach towards identifying signs of truthfulness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(1), 12–20. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.01.001
Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 589–599. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.014
Walton, D. (2003). The interrogation as a type of dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1771–1802. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00201-1
Wu, W., & Vander Beken, T. (2012). The evolution of criminal interrogation rules in China. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 40(4), 271–295. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.09.007
Yuille, J. C., Marxsen, D., & Cooper, B. (1999). Training Investigative Interviewers: Adherence to the Spirit, As Well As the Letter. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22(3), 323–336. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(99)00012-6
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1.- Si se acepta un trabajo para su publicación, los autores reconocen la cesión de los derechos de impresión y de reproducción por cualquier forma y medio a la revista Behavior & Law Journal.
2.- Asimismo, se entiende que las opiniones expresadas en los artículos son de responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen la opinión y política científica de la revista.
3.- Igualmente, las actividades descritas en los trabajos publicados estarán de acuerdo con los criterios generalmente aceptados de ética, tanto por lo que se refiere a los trabajos con humanos como a la experimentación animal, así como en todo lo relativo a la deontología profesional. Es responsabilidad de los autores poder proporcionar a los lectores interesados copias de los datos en bruto, manuales de procedimiento, puntuaciones y, en general, material experimental relevante.
4.- El artículo se dsitribuirán bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY NC ND 4.0). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. La indicación de la licencia de uso y distribución, CC BY NC ND 4.0, ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
